California Intrastate Online Poker on Hold Until 2012
Despite widespread support, it appears that intrastate online poker will not be legalized and regulated in California this year. It still seems, however, that it is a matter or “when” and not “if” for online poker in the Golden State.
In a letter to stakeholders, including Native American tribes and card rooms, California Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg said that while he supports online gaming, “significant, unresolved issues remain,” issues that just simply won’t be ironed out by September 9th, the final day of the legislative year.
“We believe the concept of bringing intrastate internet gaming to California has merit and is worth pursuing in a smart, methodical way. But if we go down this road, it is important to strike a balance between the potential significant fiscal benefits to the state coffers, impacts on sovereign nations’ interests as well as the conceivable positive and negative affects gambling has on our state,” wrote Steinberg.
Some of the aforementioned issues include “tribal exclusivity and waiver of sovereignty immunity, the types of games that would be authorized, and who would be eligible to apply for licenses and potential federal constitutional questions.”
There are actually two internet gaming bills being considered right now in California. One, introduced by Senate Governmental Organization Committee chair Rod Wright, would legalize all forms of online gambling, while Senator Lou Correa’s SB 40 is a poker-only bill. The latter is supported by the California Online Poker Association (COPA), a group led by the Morongo and San Manuel bands of Mission Indians.
While some tribes back the Correa bill, others are opposed to it, feeling that they and others will be left out of the mix, largely because of the prohibitive $50 million proposed licensing fee. Essentially, they fill the bill would cater exclusively to the largest entities.
Although issues do remain, Steinberg wrote the he believes, “absent unforeseen circumstances, we fully expect an objective proposal will be developed in the interim in time for consideration when the legislature reconvenes in 2012.”
The Senate Governmental Organization Committee will hold a hearing in January 2012 “for the purpose of moving a bill through the committee.”
While most poker players would agree that any online poker is better than none at all, many do not like the idea of ring-fencing each state, limiting players to sites where they would only be allowed to compete with people from the same state. Phil Hellmuth voiced his criticisms with Washington, D.C.’s plans for legal intrastate internet poker, saying that there simply will not be enough players for it grow to any sort of significance. At the same time, California is magnitudes larger than the United States capital, with over 37 million residents, compared to just 601,000 for the District of Columbia. California’s online poker rooms would also be privately run, as opposed to D.C.’s, which would be managed by Intralot in a partnership with the city’s government. COPA has already partnered with Playtech, owner of the iPoker Network, to provide its gaming platform.
Related Online Poker News:
- California Moves Closer to Intrastate Online Poker
- California Senate Committee Holds Intrastate Poker Hearing
- California Could Introduce Intrastate Online Poker
- California Intrastate Poker: Dorinson Changes Sides
- Proposed California Bill to Determine Online Poker Legality
- New Hope for California Online Poker Bill
- Online Poker Facing Opposition in California
- California Bill to Study Online Poker
- Legal Poker in California Closer to Happening
- California Following New Jersey’s Online Gambling Legislation Footsteps
- California to Discuss Intrastate Internet Poker Legislation on Tuesday
- Poker News Briefs, June 27, 2009
Poker talk:
- STAKE - The amount of a player's BUY-IN, or the amount of money they are willing to play with in a given session. Compare: BANKROLL.
- FREEROLL - [1] A poker tournament that does not charge a buy-in fee; players must earn buy-in credits through previous play at the same establishment. [2] Having a lock on part of a pot (sure to win a greater fraction of the pot than one is betting) and playing to win more or all of it.
- IN - Still eligible to win the pot. "I'm in" is often spoken as one adds chips to the pot, calling.
- LIVE [CARD] - In Stud, a card probably not held by other players.
- BLUFF - To make a bet or raise with a poor hand, in hope that the remaining active player(s) will fold.
- POSSIBLE [STRAIGHT/FLUSH] - Up cards that quite possibly could lead to a straight and/or a flush.

RSS feed


